Protect Sensitive Equipment
Identify potential coolant escape paths before assembly to help reduce the risk of leakage near electronics.
CAPABILITIES / QUALITY VERIFICATION
Define sealing integrity before your cooling component enters service. JBT reviews leak and pressure testing requirements for custom cold plates, manifolds and fluid assemblies against your drawings and acceptance criteria.
Share your component design and required testing conditions.
Request Testing SupportTest equipment reference · CoolingThermal
UNDERSTANDING THE TWO TESTS
Leak testing checks a sealed component against a defined leakage limit. Pressure testing evaluates its response to specified pressure conditions. Together, they help your team assess the fluid boundary before installation or further assembly.
Evaluate potential leakage through joints, ports, seals and component walls to identify sealing concerns before use.
Apply a defined pressure for a specified duration to evaluate integrity against the approved procedure.
Give every sealing requirement a clear verification method.
Discuss Your Testing RequirementsWHY TESTING MATTERS
Leakage and pressure failures can interrupt cooling and expose sensitive equipment to coolant. Defined testing helps identify manufacturing concerns while the component is still under your control.
Identify potential coolant escape paths before assembly to help reduce the risk of leakage near electronics.
Evaluate components at the agreed pressure and duration so acceptance is based on a defined test.
Use documented criteria and recorded results to support consistent release decisions across production.
Turn reliability expectations into measurable inspection requirements.
Plan Your Component VerificationTESTING CAPABILITIES
Sealing interfaces, internal volume and operating conditions shape the test setup. Reviewing them together helps establish a practical verification scope for custom liquid cooling components.
Assess leakage against an agreed limit to connect the measured result with your sealing requirement.
Define pressure and hold time to assess the fluid boundary under controlled conditions.
Review medium, sensitivity and component design to identify a suitable measurement approach.
Evaluate ports, seals and connections to reduce leakage indications caused by the fixture.
Confirm limits and decision rules before inspection to make pass, fail and review outcomes clear.
Agree record fields and reporting needs to give engineering and quality teams useful evidence.
Start with your drawing, operating pressure and acceptance criteria.
Request a Testing Feasibility ReviewTESTING METHODS
Cold plate leak testing methods differ in sensitivity, test medium and purpose. Compare the approaches below to frame your requirements; available equipment and execution scope are confirmed for each project.
Pressurize, stabilize and monitor pressure change over a defined interval. A specified limit supports production leak screening under repeatable conditions.
Use helium tracer gas with a suitable detector to evaluate small leakage paths. A defined leak-rate criterion supports applications requiring greater sensitivity.
Use a liquid medium to evaluate pressure integrity at an agreed pressure and hold time, supporting verification of the component’s fluid boundary.
Increase pressure under a controlled destructive procedure to investigate structural limits. Selected qualification samples help inform the design evaluation.
Method illustrations are reference equipment and setups, not a declaration of JBT-owned instruments. Helium leak testing cold plates, hydrostatic testing and burst testing require project-specific capability confirmation. Burst testing is destructive.
Not sure which method matches your leakage limit or pressure requirement?
Discuss Test Method SelectionTEST EQUIPMENT & PROCEDURE
Pressure regulators, sensors, sealing fixtures and recording instruments work as a system. Matching the setup to the test requirement helps distinguish component behavior from connection or measurement errors.
The selected instrument, measurement range and verification status must suit the approved procedure.
Confirm method, pressure, medium, duration and acceptance criteria to establish a common inspection basis.
Select connections and seals around the component interfaces to reduce setup-related leakage.
Install the part and verify external connections before measuring the component itself.
Apply pressure according to the approved procedure to maintain controlled test conditions.
Record the relevant measurements and compare them with agreed limits to support a release decision.
Release pressure safely and document the result to retain a clear inspection record.
Build a repeatable cold plate pressure test around defined inputs.
Review Your Testing ProcedureTEST REQUIREMENTS & ACCEPTANCE
Documented test conditions turn a general quality expectation into a clear acceptance decision. Agreeing these details before inspection supports consistent evaluation and useful records.
Review drawings and customer procedures to align inspection with the intended application.
Define medium, pressure, stabilization and hold time to make the measurement reproducible.
Specify allowable pressure change or leak rate so sealing acceptance has a measurable basis.
Record conditions, measurements and disposition to support engineering and quality review.
Identify applicable standards, qualification requirements and reporting scope during review. Confirm equipment suitability and test sensitivity before making a compliance claim.
Have a customer test specification or qualification checklist?
Send Your Acceptance RequirementsCOMPONENT APPLICATIONS
Fluid-containing products need a verification plan that reflects their joints, ports and enclosed passages. Review the component types below to identify the interfaces that matter for your project.
Evaluate enclosed channels, connection ports and sealed joints to verify the coolant boundary against your requirements.
Explore detailsFocus on brazed interfaces and enclosed passages to investigate leakage paths after joining.
Explore detailsReview fluid passages, plugs and connection ports to establish suitable sealing and pressure checks.
Explore detailsConsider connectors, hoses and component interfaces together to define the assembly-level test boundary.
Explore detailsProduct reference photography illustrates component types. Manifold reference: Haiwu.
Your cooling component has a unique sealing layout. Let’s review it.
Discuss Your Component ApplicationTESTING QUALITY ASSURANCE
Reliable coolant leak testing depends on connections, stable conditions and suitable instruments. Reviewing the full setup helps reduce false indications and supports clearer quality decisions.
Check seals and external connections so fixture leakage is not mistaken for a component defect.
Apply defined pressure, stabilization and duration to make results comparable.
Confirm measurement range, sensitivity and instrument verification status before inspection.
Compare results with approved criteria and route nonconforming components for review.
Establish the procedure and acceptance limits before inspection. Investigate nonconforming results and document the agreed disposition.
Make setup verification part of your inspection plan.
Discuss Testing Quality ControlsTEST DATA & TRACEABILITY
Test documentation links conditions and measured results with the applicable acceptance criteria, giving your team a useful basis for component review and issue investigation.
DOCUMENTATION FRAMEWORK
| Part Number / Batch | As specified |
|---|---|
| Test Method | Per approved procedure |
| Test Pressure | Project-specific |
| Test Duration | Project-specific |
| Measured Result | Recorded during testing |
| Acceptance Criteria | Customer-defined limit |
| Inspection Status | Pass / Fail / Review |
Illustrative record fields only. No actual test results are shown.
Associate the test record with the relevant part or batch so the result can be reviewed in context.
Retain specified conditions and measured values to support meaningful comparisons.
Record the evaluation against approved limits to explain the inspection decision.
Use available records to investigate findings and respond to customer questions.
Agree report format, retention requirements and identification scope during project review. No universal digital traceability or retention period is assumed.
Tell us which records your quality team needs before production.
Review Your Reporting RequirementsMANUFACTURING INTEGRATION
Consider testing during engineering review, then coordinate it with machining, joining and final inspection. Early planning helps protect access to ports and sealing surfaces throughout production.
Identify interfaces and test requirements early to inform access, fixtures and validation scope.
Produce channels, ports and mating surfaces to establish the component’s functional geometry.
Complete applicable brazing, welding and sealing operations to close the fluid boundary.
Evaluate the completed boundary under approved conditions before release.
Review results and address nonconformities to support a documented disposition.
Coordinate cleaning, drying and packaging to prepare accepted parts for delivery.
Port access, fixture clearance and cleanliness needs can influence the manufacturing sequence. Reviewing these details alongside CNC machining, vacuum brazing and friction stir welding helps avoid downstream conflicts.
Connect your manufacturing route with the right verification stage.
Plan an Integrated Manufacturing ReviewWHY WORK WITH JBT
JBT connects precision component manufacturing with drawing-based testing review. Considering geometry, joining and inspection together helps define a scope that fits your cooling project.
Review channels, ports and joining interfaces in the context of the finished cooling component.
Use your drawings and operating conditions to focus the technical discussion on actual requirements.
Consider testing after machining, joining and assembly to select useful inspection stages.
Review report fields and acceptance requirements early so records match your quality needs.
Bring design, production and verification into one project discussion.
Discuss Your Testing ProjectTESTING APPLICATION EXAMPLES
These project scenarios illustrate common verification concerns, helping you frame a component-specific test request. They are not presented as completed JBT customer cases.
Focus on brazed joints, sealed passages and inlet/outlet connections. Define a suitable test boundary to evaluate joint integrity and pressure retention.
Review welded closure interfaces and enclosed channels. Select test conditions that address sealing continuity along the joined structure.
Consider machined passages, plugs and threaded ports together. A defined connection plan helps evaluate the complete fluid distribution boundary.
Reference product photographs illustrate the application types; no customer test results are claimed.
Need to evaluate a similar liquid cooling component?
Submit Your Testing RequirementsFREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
Practical answers about cold plate leak rate testing, pressure verification and the information needed for a project-specific review.
Leak testing checks a component against a defined leakage limit. Pressure testing evaluates its response to specified pressure conditions. The two serve different purposes, so the procedure and acceptance criteria must be agreed separately.
Pressure decay and tracer-gas methods are common approaches. Internal volume, allowable leakage, material and sensitivity requirements guide selection; project equipment and execution scope must be confirmed.
Use the approved drawing, intended operating conditions and applicable customer specification or standard. The pressure, medium, stabilization period and hold time should be defined before testing; no universal multiplier is assumed.
The sealed component is pressurized, allowed to stabilize and observed for pressure change over a defined interval. Temperature, volume and fixture behavior affect the result, so evaluation requires controlled conditions and an established limit.
Helium testing may suit a low specified leak-rate limit or a qualification requirement that cannot be addressed by the selected pressure-based method. Sensitivity, background control and suitable detector availability must be reviewed.
No. A hydrostatic test uses liquid pressure to evaluate integrity at defined conditions. A burst test intentionally investigates failure pressure under a controlled destructive procedure and is typically applied to selected qualification samples.
Testing after joining can evaluate the completed fluid boundary. Method selection should consider joint design, access, cleanliness and any subsequent operations that could affect the seal.
Provide drawings, component type, quantity, operating pressure, test medium, specified test pressure and duration, leakage limit and reporting requirements. If the method is undecided, share the intended application for review.
Have a requirement that is specific to your cooling assembly?
Ask a Testing QuestionSTART YOUR TESTING PROJECT
Share your drawings, operating pressure and acceptance criteria with JBT. A project-specific review helps establish the test scope before prototype or production commitments.
Review component geometry and sealing interfaces to focus the test plan.
Consider pressure, medium, duration and leakage criteria to define the verification need.
Connect inspection requirements with the planned manufacturing route and records.
Prepare the details below for your technical review.
Use the contact button below to send your inquiry. This form layout is a preview; direct submission and drawing upload are not enabled.
Send your component details to request a technical review and quotation.
Contact JBT for Testing Support